The United States
would not object to Britain
and France
arming Syrian rebel groups now fighting to topple the regime of Bashar
al-Assad, secretary of state John Kerry said.
…
"President Obama has made it
clear that the United States
does not stand in the way of other countries that have made a decision to
provide arms, whether it’s France
or Britain
or others," said Mr Kerry. "He believes that we need to change
President Assad’s calculation. "
All these people who against arming FSA, they can not see
the criminal gets arm from Iran and Russia slaughtering innocence civilian so
these who against arming FSA is, let Syrian people die from criminal assad indiscriminate missile bombs assault and wipe them out let the criminal stay in power? He will not give up unless force to him to so. He doesn't care whether
Syrian completely is destroyed or million of people were killed, he is mealy interest in his survival or regime's, all his deliberately destruction says about his mentally of, so that international
community is too hard so that they give up the
revolutionary. Well that is not happen for sure!
Update: some of EU countries against the arming, more wider destruction and worry about jihadist. But we have to consider without arming FSA that mean stalemate long period of time, both-side will not give up, naturally civilians casualty will be increase and refugees, a huge human crisis is coming, spill over neighboring countries, all that account into, which has more heavy weighted. In my view jihadist will not be a major problems, among them very few numbers are extremists from foreigner fighters, rest of them are Syrian they joined extremist group because their rich resources money and weapons, which FSA didn't have, as majority of them will be go back to the FSA when they have been armed. Also after all of this, do you anyone can see criminal assad deserve to be alive?
Additional Weapons that could change the game in Syria
Update: some of EU countries against the arming, more wider destruction and worry about jihadist. But we have to consider without arming FSA that mean stalemate long period of time, both-side will not give up, naturally civilians casualty will be increase and refugees, a huge human crisis is coming, spill over neighboring countries, all that account into, which has more heavy weighted. In my view jihadist will not be a major problems, among them very few numbers are extremists from foreigner fighters, rest of them are Syrian they joined extremist group because their rich resources money and weapons, which FSA didn't have, as majority of them will be go back to the FSA when they have been armed. Also after all of this, do you anyone can see criminal assad deserve to be alive?
Additional Weapons that could change the game in Syria
