…
By some accounts, two strands of
the debate — how to respond to the possible use of chemical weapons and how to
deal with the recent setbacks to the rebels — are beginning to merge in the
administration’s deliberations.
Be silly, well yes, I learnt this from Paul Krugmen, his word
“silly” ofcourse not silly at all but
deadly, complexity to simplified, I am
not joke, when you have really serious problems, you digging into the hills arduous
discusses desert every angles that make you impossible to act you only can see
land minds around you so you can not move a step, Napoleon said “ war is war” what
can you do about it? Arming FSA Revolutionary is the solution. If FSA strong
well armed there would be again large defection.
Update: Qusayr battle for example, well armed Hezbollah( by any mean they had high moral as it was not their war) on the ground with tanks heavy weapons and criminal gang fighter jets airstrikes at the 50,000 populated city, they took almost 20 days to fall. What this mean is that , even if not well trained demoralized people can fight well if they are well armed. The FSA Revolutionary able to withstands and fought 20 days with only light arms without food you can bet your bottom dollar if they are well armed!
Update: Qusayr battle for example, well armed Hezbollah( by any mean they had high moral as it was not their war) on the ground with tanks heavy weapons and criminal gang fighter jets airstrikes at the 50,000 populated city, they took almost 20 days to fall. What this mean is that , even if not well trained demoralized people can fight well if they are well armed. The FSA Revolutionary able to withstands and fought 20 days with only light arms without food you can bet your bottom dollar if they are well armed!
