…
The late Libyan
leader Muammar Qaddafi described the rebels as Al-Qaeda terrorists and tried to
exploit his contacts with Western intelligence agencies to promote his image as
a leader in a war on terrorism. Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh, while combating
the rebellion repositioned his troops to make way for Al-Qaeda-affiliated
extremists to control cities and provinces in his country to continue his
control over the country. Yemeni troops are now locked in bloody confrontations
to uproot the extremists from their recently-established strongholds. Now,
Syrian leader Bashar Assad seems to be doing the same. Car bombs have hit
buildings housing offices of security agencies in Damascus
and Aleppo
claiming the lives of many people. Damascus
was quick to accuse Al-Qaeda, and few days later a previously unheard of group
calling itself the An-Nussra Front and alleging to be affiliated with Al-Qaeda,
posted a claim on the website saying it was behind the bombings. A day later
the same group disassociated itself from the bombings.
The Syrian
regime efforts to associate the opposition with Al-Qaeda are getting indirect
support from the West with statements made every now and then by officials
speaking about “a presence of Al-Qaeda in Syria ,” but without knowing what
they are doing exactly. It is strange that Al-Qaeda, known to have the United States
and the West as its arch enemy, chooses to take on the Syrian regime that is
known for its animosity to the West. Since the US
invasion of Iraq in 2003, Syria was widely known by the intelligence
community in the West and by the Iraqi government to be a main passageway to
Islamic militants in route to carry out attacks and suicide bombings against U.S. troops and their allies in Iraq . Also, a
year after the Syrian troops were forced out of Lebanon
by the Cedar Revolution in 2005, a group calling itself Fateh Al-Islam suddenly
appeared in northern Lebanon
at Nahr Al-Bared Palestinian refugee camp. The group’s leader, Shaker Al-Absi,
had just been released from a Syrian jail, and most of the group’s members came
via Syria .
Although the group claimed to be affiliated with Al-Qaeda, nevertheless,
Al-Qaeda never adopted it. This was then a simple message to the international
community that with Syria
out, Lebanon
has become vulnerable to extremist forces. With a similar scenario now in its
own country, the regime is playing the same game: Me or Al-Qaeda?
…
The cost of
delaying the intervention seems to be by far outweighing the cost of a near
swift intervention, whether via a United Nations Security Council Resolution or
via an international coalition that will include Arab forces. Waiting two more
months until the end of the mandate of the UN monitors whose presence in Syrian
cities for over a month has not deterred the regime from its daily killings is
just prolonging the suffering of the Syrian people and giving the regime more
time. Efforts to get the regime to adhere to Kofi Annan’s peace plan have
proven futile. The international community has always adopted a policy of no
negotiations with those who support terrorists to avoid being blackmailed by
those forces who support violent extremists. It is time to do the same with the
Syrian regime.
And I am listening this is this old or young music? I like it very much!
And I am listening this is this old or young music? I like it very much!