It would be calamitous if NATO ended its mission in Libya before a negotiated settlement between the two sides, one of Canada's top soldiers told MPs Friday.
...
To withdraw under the country's current conditions, he said, "would be a calamity. An absolute calamity."
NATO must be fulfilled its obligations, you can not withdrew midst of the war. That would be the worst scenario. In recent days, Gaddafi full focuses on propaganda the NATO because he hopes some people pressured on the NATO so they can stop the bombings. But if NATO stops the whole Libya into the chaos. EU or international community should aware of the consequences of the regional – oil exporting countries- political and economical chaos. We don’t want anymore necessary conflict. Also the civilians fighters are moving and wining territories steadily and their moral is high. Gaddafi is the problems as we diagnosed five months ago, NATO able to pinpoint the problem and get rid of. Without Gaddafi the Libyan civilian safe. Gaddafi is the very danger. The interpretation of the UN Resolution is up to the NATO.
Libya is not asking money, when many countries accept the NTC as the sole legitimate government in Libya- should hurry up- and also many countries release the money they seized from the Gaddafis, and continuously pressured on Gaddafi then the civilian fighters in bushiness in their land.